Screener
SECT vs IMTB
Main Sector Rotation ETF vs iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF
Key differences
- IMTB costs 0.63% less per year.
- SECT is significantly larger than IMTB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SECT is classified as equity, while IMTB is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- SECT follows a active selection strategy; IMTB uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, SECT has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| SECT | IMTB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.06% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.6B | $280M |
| Since | 2017 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 0.65% | 4.46% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.2% | +6.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.4% | +4.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.0% | +0.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.99 | 0.24 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.15% | 4.07% |
| Max drawdown | -38.09% | -18.15% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SECT and IMTB
Explore further