Screener
SECT vs RHRX
Main Sector Rotation ETF vs RH Tactical Rotation ETF
Key differences
- SECT costs 0.69% less per year.
- SECT is significantly larger than RHRX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SECT is classified as equity, while RHRX is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- SECT follows a active selection strategy; RHRX uses option income.
- Over the last 3 years, RHRX has delivered higher annualized returns.
- RHRX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SECT | RHRX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 1.38% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.6B | $34M |
| Since | 2017 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 0.65% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.7% | +39.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.4% | +22.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.98 | 1.09 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.14% | 13.26% |
| Max drawdown | -38.09% | -25.33% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SECT and RHRX
Explore further