Screener
SECT vs WZRD
Main Sector Rotation ETF vs Opportunistic Trader ETF
Key differences
- SECT costs 0.31% less per year.
- SECT is significantly larger than WZRD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SECT is classified as equity, while WZRD is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- SECT follows a active selection strategy; WZRD uses structured outcome.
- SECT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SECT | WZRD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 1.00% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.6B | $4M |
| Since | 2017 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.65% | — |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.98 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.14% | — |
| Max drawdown | -38.09% | -71.81% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SECT and WZRD
Explore further