Screener
SECT vs ZTEN
Main Sector Rotation ETF vs F/M 10-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
Key differences
- ZTEN costs 0.54% less per year.
- SECT is significantly larger than ZTEN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SECT is classified as equity, while ZTEN is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- SECT covers north america markets; ZTEN covers global.
- SECT follows a active selection strategy; ZTEN uses index tracking.
- SECT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SECT | ZTEN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.6B | $30M |
| Since | 2017 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.65% | 5.56% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.2% | +7.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.99 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.15% | 5.06% |
| Max drawdown | -38.09% | -5.36% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SECT and ZTEN
Explore further