Screener
SECU vs BILT
iShares Securitized Income Active ETF vs iShares Infrastructure Active ETF
Key differences
- SECU costs 0.20% less per year.
- SECU is significantly larger than BILT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SECU is classified as alternative, while BILT is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- SECU follows a multi strategy strategy; BILT uses active selection.
- SECU has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SECU | BILT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $592M | $26M |
| Since | 2005 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 4.99% | — |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | multi strategy | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | — |
| Max drawdown | -1.76% | -5.38% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SECU and BILT
Explore further