Screener
SEPI vs FTMA
Shelton Equity Premium Income ETF vs Franklin Massachusetts Municipal Inc ETF
Key differences
- FTMA costs 0.19% less per year.
- SEPI is classified as alternative, while FTMA is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- SEPI follows a option income strategy; FTMA uses index tracking.
- FTMA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SEPI | FTMA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.54% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $117M | $273M |
| Since | 2025 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | — | 3.15% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | — |
| Max drawdown | -7.66% | -2.27% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SEPI and FTMA
Explore further