Screener
SFTY vs CGUS
Horizon Managed Risk ETF vs Capital Group Core Equity ETF
Key differences
- CGUS costs 0.44% less per year.
- CGUS is significantly larger than SFTY — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SFTY is classified as alternative, while CGUS is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- SFTY follows a option income strategy; CGUS uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| SFTY | CGUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.77% | 0.33% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $370M | $10.3B |
| Since | 2025 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.90% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +27.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +23.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.30 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 12.31% |
| Max drawdown | -8.64% | -22.15% |
Similar to SFTY and CGUS
Explore further