Screener
SGDM vs URNM
Sprott Gold Miners ETF vs Sprott Uranium Miners Etf
Key differences
- SGDM costs 0.29% less per year.
- URNM is significantly larger than SGDM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SGDM follows a active selection strategy; URNM uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, SGDM has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SGDM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SGDM | URNM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.46% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $660M | $2.4B |
| Since | 2014 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 1.01% | 2.58% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +66.9% | +52.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +38.0% | +29.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +18.5% | +16.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.97 | 0.72 |
| Volatility 1Y | 44.78% | 51.03% |
| Max drawdown | -49.69% | -50.78% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SGDM and URNM
Explore further