Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

SGOL vs PALL

abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF vs abrdn Physical Palladium Shares ETF

SGOL

abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF

Annual cost

0.17%

Fund size

$7.7B

PALL

abrdn Physical Palladium Shares ETF

Annual cost

0.60%

Fund size

$754M

Key differences

Both SGOL and PALL are commodity ETFs. SGOL charges 0.17% a year and PALL 0.60%. The main difference: SGOL costs 0.43% less per year.

  • SGOL costs 0.43% less per year.
  • SGOL is much larger than PALL. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last three years, SGOL has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

SGOLPALL
Annual cost (TER)0.17%0.60%
Fund size (AUM)$7.7B$754M
Since20092010
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Asset classcommoditycommodity
Region
Strategy
CAGR 1Y+27.8%+21.9%
CAGR 3Y+29.8%-4.0%
CAGR 5Y+17.6%-15.7%
Sharpe 3Y1.240.01
Volatility 1Y26.58%50.61%
Max drawdown-21.56%-73.63%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to SGOL and PALL