Screener
SGRT vs IJK
SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF vs iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF
Key differences
- SGRT follows a active selection strategy; IJK uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| SGRT | IJK | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | — | 0.17% |
| Fund size (AUM) | — | $10.6B |
| Since | — | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.57% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +30.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +18.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.79 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 17.21% |
| Max drawdown | -17.87% | -39.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SGRT and IJK
Explore further