Screener
SGRW vs IJT
Harbor Active Small Cap Growth ETF vs iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF
Key differences
- SGRW follows a active selection strategy; IJT uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| SGRW | IJT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | — | 0.18% |
| Fund size (AUM) | — | $7.3B |
| Since | — | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.77% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +28.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +15.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +5.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.65 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 17.64% |
| Max drawdown | -16.25% | -42.03% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SGRW and IJT
Explore further