Screener
SH vs SDOW
ProShares Short S&P500 vs ProShares UltraPro Short Dow30
Key differences
- SH costs 0.06% less per year.
- SH is significantly larger than SDOW — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, SH has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| SH | SDOW | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.89% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.2B | $180M |
| Since | 2006 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 4.32% | 5.17% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | inverse | inverse |
| CAGR 1Y | -19.2% | -43.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | -13.5% | -32.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | -9.5% | -25.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -1.15 | -0.87 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.96% | 36.38% |
| Max drawdown | -75.87% | -99.23% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SH and SDOW
Explore further