Screener
SH vs SSO
ProShares Short S&P500 vs ProShares Ultra S&P500
Key differences
- SSO is significantly larger than SH — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SH follows a inverse strategy; SSO uses leveraged.
- Over the last 3 years, SSO has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| SH | SSO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.89% | 0.87% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.2B | $7.3B |
| Since | 2006 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 4.32% | 0.68% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | inverse | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | -19.2% | +60.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | -13.5% | +39.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | -9.5% | +20.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -1.15 | 1.15 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.96% | 23.92% |
| Max drawdown | -75.87% | -59.34% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SH and SSO
Explore further