Screener
SH vs SZK
ProShares Short S&P500 vs ProShares UltraShort Consumer Staples
Key differences
- SH costs 0.06% less per year.
- SH is significantly larger than SZK — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, SZK has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| SH | SZK | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.89% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.2B | $5M |
| Since | 2006 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 4.32% | 2.80% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | inverse | inverse |
| CAGR 1Y | -19.2% | -6.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | -13.5% | -4.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | -9.5% | -5.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -1.15 | -0.21 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.96% | 24.93% |
| Max drawdown | -75.87% | -86.79% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SH and SZK
Explore further