Skip to content
Screener

SH vs TTT

ProShares Short S&P500 vs ProShares UltraPro Short 20+ Year Treasury

SH

ProShares Short S&P500

Annual cost

0.89%

Fund size

$981M

TTT

ProShares UltraPro Short 20+ Year Treasury

Annual cost

0.95%

Fund size

$19M

Key differences

SH is an equity ETF, while TTT is a fixed income ETF. SH charges 0.89% a year and TTT 0.95%.

  • SH is an equity fund, while TTT is a fixed income fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
  • SH follows a inverse strategy; TTT uses leveraged.
  • SH costs 0.06% less per year.
  • SH is much larger than TTT. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last three years, TTT has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • SH has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

SHTTT
Annual cost (TER)0.89%0.95%
Fund size (AUM)$981M$19M
Since20062012
Dividend yield4.52%8.74%
Asset classequityfixed income
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyinverseleveraged
CAGR 1Y-16.1%+0.5%
CAGR 3Y-12.8%+12.0%
CAGR 5Y-8.8%+17.1%
Sharpe 3Y-1.100.39
Volatility 1Y12.09%28.91%
Max drawdown-76.12%-81.76%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to SH and TTT