Screener
SHUS vs EPSV
Stratified LargeCap Hedged ETF vs Harbor SMID Cap Value ETF
Key differences
- SHUS costs 0.09% less per year.
- SHUS is significantly larger than EPSV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SHUS is classified as alternative, while EPSV is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- SHUS follows a option income strategy; EPSV uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| SHUS | EPSV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.88% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $24M | $5M |
| Since | 2021 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.29% | — |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +17.7% | +43.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.61 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.18% | 17.79% |
| Max drawdown | -14.09% | -8.93% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SHUS and EPSV
Explore further