Screener
SHUS vs FDG
Stratified LargeCap Hedged ETF vs American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF
Key differences
- FDG costs 0.34% less per year.
- FDG is significantly larger than SHUS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SHUS is classified as alternative, while FDG is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- SHUS follows a option income strategy; FDG uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, FDG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| SHUS | FDG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.45% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $24M | $387M |
| Since | 2021 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 1.29% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +18.8% | +37.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.5% | +32.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +13.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.60 | 1.23 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.16% | 17.85% |
| Max drawdown | -14.09% | -43.69% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SHUS and FDG
Explore further