Screener
SHUS vs OSEA
Stratified LargeCap Hedged ETF vs Harbor International Compounders ETF
Key differences
- OSEA costs 0.24% less per year.
- OSEA is significantly larger than SHUS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SHUS is classified as alternative, while OSEA is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- SHUS covers north america markets; OSEA covers global.
- SHUS follows a option income strategy; OSEA uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, SHUS has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| SHUS | OSEA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $24M | $497M |
| Since | 2021 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 1.29% | 1.23% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +17.7% | +7.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.5% | +7.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.61 | 0.30 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.18% | 15.18% |
| Max drawdown | -14.09% | -18.14% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SHUS and OSEA
Explore further