Screener
SILJ vs COPJ
Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF vs Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF
Key differences
- SILJ costs 0.06% less per year.
- SILJ is significantly larger than COPJ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SILJ is classified as alternative, while COPJ is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- SILJ follows a option income strategy; COPJ uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, SILJ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SILJ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SILJ | COPJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.9B | $162M |
| Since | 2012 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 1.89% | 11.05% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +132.2% | +125.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +46.8% | +43.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.00 | 1.10 |
| Volatility 1Y | 54.92% | 41.67% |
| Max drawdown | -70.07% | -32.28% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SILJ and COPJ
Explore further