Screener
SIZE vs SQLT
iShares MSCI USA Size Factor ETF vs Ishares MSCI USA Small-Cap Quality Factor ETF
Key differences
- SIZE costs 0.05% less per year.
- SIZE is significantly larger than SQLT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SIZE has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SIZE | SQLT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $409M | $7M |
| Since | 2013 | 2026 |
| Dividend yield | 1.46% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +18.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.3% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.84 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.83% | — |
| Max drawdown | -39.15% | -3.95% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SIZE and SQLT
Explore further