Screener
SKF vs UPW
ProShares UltraShort Financials vs ProShares Ultra Utilities
Key differences
- SKF follows a inverse strategy; UPW uses leveraged.
- Over the last 3 years, UPW has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| SKF | UPW | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $16M | $25M |
| Since | 2007 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 4.31% | 1.35% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | inverse | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | -4.1% | +21.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | -25.2% | +18.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | -16.7% | +11.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.85 | 0.58 |
| Volatility 1Y | 28.99% | 28.45% |
| Max drawdown | -96.51% | -62.67% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SKF and UPW
Explore further