Screener
SKRE vs MAGO
Tuttle Capital Daily 2X Inverse Regional Banks ETF vs Tuttle Capital Magnificent 7 Income Blast ETF
Key differences
- SKRE costs 0.24% less per year.
- SKRE is significantly larger than MAGO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SKRE is classified as equity, while MAGO is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- SKRE follows a inverse strategy; MAGO uses option income.
Side-by-side comparison
| SKRE | MAGO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.99% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $10M | $2M |
| Since | 2024 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.31% | — |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | inverse | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | -43.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 46.69% | — |
| Max drawdown | -75.30% | -17.98% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SKRE and MAGO
Explore further