Screener
SLX vs SMH
VanEck Steel ETF vs VanEck Semiconductor ETF
Key differences
- SMH costs 0.20% less per year.
- SMH is significantly larger than SLX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SLX covers global markets; SMH covers north america.
- Over the last 3 years, SMH has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SLX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SLX | SMH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $159M | $58.8B |
| Since | 2006 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 1.27% | 0.22% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +80.3% | +151.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +26.6% | +65.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +16.6% | +39.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.95 | 1.52 |
| Volatility 1Y | 24.19% | 30.57% |
| Max drawdown | -61.90% | -45.30% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SLX and SMH
Explore further