Screener
SLYV vs CATH
State Street SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF vs Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF
Key differences
- SLYV costs 0.14% less per year.
- SLYV is significantly larger than CATH — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, CATH has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SLYV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SLYV | CATH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $4.6B | $1.2B |
| Since | 2000 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 1.84% | 0.80% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +41.5% | +27.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.4% | +21.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.5% | +13.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.61 | 1.13 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.44% | 12.32% |
| Max drawdown | -47.73% | -33.95% |
Similar to SLYV and CATH
Explore further