Screener
SMAP vs CCOR
Amplify Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF vs Core Alternative ETF
Key differences
- SMAP costs 0.69% less per year.
- CCOR is significantly larger than SMAP — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SMAP is classified as equity, while CCOR is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- SMAP follows a index tracking strategy; CCOR uses option income.
- CCOR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SMAP | CCOR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 1.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1M | $28M |
| Since | 2024 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.42% | 1.08% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +12.9% | -5.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | -2.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -2.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | -0.56 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.82% | 6.92% |
| Max drawdown | -24.12% | -22.99% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SMAP and CCOR
Explore further