Screener
SMAP vs CGGR
Amplify Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF vs Capital Group Growth ETF
Key differences
- CGGR costs 0.21% less per year.
- CGGR is significantly larger than SMAP — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SMAP covers north america markets; CGGR covers global.
- SMAP follows a index tracking strategy; CGGR uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| SMAP | CGGR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1M | $22.2B |
| Since | 2024 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.42% | 0.10% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +12.9% | +26.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +26.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.16 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.82% | 16.35% |
| Max drawdown | -24.12% | -28.90% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SMAP and CGGR
Explore further