Screener
SMAP vs HCOW
Amplify Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF vs Amplify COWS Covered Call ETF
Key differences
- SMAP costs 0.05% less per year.
- HCOW is significantly larger than SMAP — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SMAP is classified as equity, while HCOW is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- SMAP follows a index tracking strategy; HCOW uses option income.
Side-by-side comparison
| SMAP | HCOW | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1M | $15M |
| Since | 2024 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.42% | 11.68% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +12.9% | +23.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.82% | 14.08% |
| Max drawdown | -24.12% | -24.15% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SMAP and HCOW
Explore further