Screener
SMAP vs ISCG
Amplify Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF vs iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF
Key differences
- ISCG costs 0.54% less per year.
- ISCG is significantly larger than SMAP — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ISCG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SMAP | ISCG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.06% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1M | $947M |
| Since | 2024 | 2004 |
| Dividend yield | 0.42% | 0.58% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +12.9% | +34.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +18.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +6.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.74 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.82% | 18.24% |
| Max drawdown | -24.12% | -41.48% |
Similar to SMAP and ISCG
Explore further