Screener
SMB vs PPH
VanEck Short Muni ETF vs VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF
Key differences
- SMB costs 0.29% less per year.
- PPH is significantly larger than SMB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SMB is classified as fixed income, while PPH is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, PPH has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| SMB | PPH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.07% | 0.36% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $305M | $966M |
| Since | 2008 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 2.69% | 2.12% |
| Asset class | fixed income | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +3.4% | +24.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.6% | +12.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.2% | +9.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.00 | 0.61 |
| Volatility 1Y | 1.68% | 17.11% |
| Max drawdown | -12.64% | -29.70% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SMB and PPH
Explore further