Screener
SMCO vs IJH
Hilton Small-Midcap Opportunity ETF vs iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF
Key differences
- IJH costs 0.50% less per year.
- IJH is significantly larger than SMCO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SMCO follows a active selection strategy; IJH uses index tracking.
- IJH has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SMCO | IJH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.05% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $129M | $115.7B |
| Since | 2023 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 0.91% | 1.22% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.8% | +25.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +16.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.76 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.73% | 15.53% |
| Max drawdown | -22.71% | -42.18% |
Similar to SMCO and IJH
Explore further