Screener
SMCO vs IJS
Hilton Small-Midcap Opportunity ETF vs iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF
Key differences
- IJS costs 0.37% less per year.
- IJS is significantly larger than SMCO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SMCO follows a active selection strategy; IJS uses index tracking.
- IJS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SMCO | IJS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.18% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $129M | $7.9B |
| Since | 2023 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 0.91% | 1.31% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.8% | +38.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +14.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +6.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.59 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.73% | 18.27% |
| Max drawdown | -22.71% | -47.68% |
Similar to SMCO and IJS
Explore further