Screener
SMDV vs DIV
ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF vs Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF
Key differences
- Over the last 3 years, DIV has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| SMDV | DIV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.45% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $661M | $750M |
| Since | 2015 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 2.38% | 6.57% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +15.7% | +20.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.6% | +13.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.1% | +6.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.44 | 0.76 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.90% | 10.29% |
| Max drawdown | -34.12% | -52.74% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SMDV and DIV
Explore further