Screener
SMDV vs VONG
ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF vs Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund ETF Shares
Key differences
- VONG costs 0.34% less per year.
- VONG is significantly larger than SMDV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, VONG has delivered higher annualized returns.
- VONG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SMDV | VONG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.06% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $661M | $50.6B |
| Since | 2015 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 2.38% | 0.45% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +15.7% | +27.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.6% | +26.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.1% | +15.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.44 | 1.14 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.90% | 15.48% |
| Max drawdown | -34.12% | -32.72% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SMDV and VONG
Explore further