Screener
SMH vs PSI
VanEck Semiconductor ETF vs Invesco Semiconductors ETF
Key differences
- SMH costs 0.21% less per year.
- SMH is significantly larger than PSI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, SMH has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PSI has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SMH | PSI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.56% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $58.8B | $2.0B |
| Since | 2011 | 2005 |
| Dividend yield | 0.22% | 0.06% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +139.4% | +195.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +65.2% | +58.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +38.8% | +32.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.52 | 1.30 |
| Volatility 1Y | 30.31% | 37.31% |
| Max drawdown | -45.30% | -44.85% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SMH and PSI
Explore further