Screener
SMIZ vs ISCV
Zacks Small/Mid Cap ETF vs iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Value ETF
Key differences
- ISCV costs 0.49% less per year.
- SMIZ follows a active selection strategy; ISCV uses index tracking.
- ISCV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SMIZ | ISCV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.06% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $258M | $659M |
| Since | 2023 | 2004 |
| Dividend yield | 0.54% | 1.88% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.0% | +28.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +17.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +6.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.73 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.00% | 16.30% |
| Max drawdown | -25.04% | -51.56% |
Similar to SMIZ and ISCV
Explore further