Screener
SMLF vs DYNF
iShares U.S. Small-Cap Equity Factor ETF vs iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF
Key differences
- SMLF costs 0.11% less per year.
- DYNF is significantly larger than SMLF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SMLF follows a index tracking strategy; DYNF uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, DYNF has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| SMLF | DYNF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.26% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.6B | $34.0B |
| Since | 2015 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 1.07% | 0.94% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +33.9% | +32.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.8% | +27.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.4% | +16.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.87 | 1.40 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.37% | 12.60% |
| Max drawdown | -41.89% | -34.72% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SMLF and DYNF
Explore further