Screener
SMLF vs OMFS
iShares U.S. Small-Cap Equity Factor ETF vs Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF
Key differences
- SMLF costs 0.24% less per year.
- SMLF is significantly larger than OMFS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SMLF follows a index tracking strategy; OMFS uses index enhanced.
- Over the last 3 years, SMLF has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| SMLF | OMFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.6B | $275M |
| Since | 2015 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 1.07% | 0.93% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.5% | +30.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.4% | +15.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.7% | +6.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.86 | 0.63 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.32% | 17.63% |
| Max drawdown | -41.89% | -42.50% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SMLF and OMFS
Explore further