Screener
SMOG vs ESGV
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF vs Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF
Key differences
- ESGV costs 0.55% less per year.
- ESGV is significantly larger than SMOG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SMOG covers global markets; ESGV covers north america.
- Over the last 3 years, ESGV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SMOG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SMOG | ESGV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.64% | 0.09% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $152M | $12.5B |
| Since | 2007 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 1.31% | 0.90% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +43.1% | +28.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.7% | +23.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.0% | +12.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.45 | 1.15 |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.30% | 13.48% |
| Max drawdown | -51.11% | -33.66% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SMOG and ESGV
Explore further