Screener
SMOG vs ICLN
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF vs iShares Global Clean Energy ETF
Key differences
- ICLN costs 0.25% less per year.
- ICLN is significantly larger than SMOG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, SMOG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| SMOG | ICLN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.64% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $152M | $2.5B |
| Since | 2007 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 1.31% | 1.30% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +43.1% | +78.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.7% | +7.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.0% | +2.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.45 | 0.27 |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.30% | 25.99% |
| Max drawdown | -51.11% | -66.75% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SMOG and ICLN
Explore further