Screener
SMTH vs IG
ALPS Smith Core Plus Bond ETF vs Principal Investment Grade Corporate ETF
Key differences
- IG costs 0.40% less per year.
- SMTH is significantly larger than IG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SMTH follows a index tracking strategy; IG uses active selection.
- IG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SMTH | IG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.7B | $179M |
| Since | 2023 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 4.41% | 5.06% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.8% | +7.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +5.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +0.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.27 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.95% | 4.81% |
| Max drawdown | -4.10% | -23.17% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SMTH and IG
Explore further