Screener
SNSR vs CHPX
Global X Internet of Things ETF vs Global X AI Semiconductor & Quantum ETF
Key differences
- CHPX costs 0.18% less per year.
- SNSR is significantly larger than CHPX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SNSR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SNSR | CHPX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.68% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $218M | $40M |
| Since | 2016 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.45% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +48.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.3% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.67 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 23.56% | — |
| Max drawdown | -38.46% | -15.15% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SNSR and CHPX
Explore further