Screener
SPAB vs CPAG
State Street SPDR Portfolio Aggregate Bond ETF vs F/m Compoundr U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
Key differences
- SPAB costs 0.28% less per year.
- SPAB is significantly larger than CPAG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SPAB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SPAB | CPAG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.03% | 0.31% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $9.7B | $270M |
| Since | 2007 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 4.01% | — |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +0.2% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.08 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.81% | — |
| Max drawdown | -18.56% | -2.78% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SPAB and CPAG
Explore further