Screener
SPAM vs ACVF
Themes Cybersecurity ETF vs American Conservative Values ETF
Key differences
- SPAM costs 0.40% less per year.
- ACVF is significantly larger than SPAM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SPAM follows a index tracking strategy; ACVF uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| SPAM | ACVF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2M | $146M |
| Since | 2023 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 0.48% | 0.57% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.2% | +21.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +19.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +12.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.09 |
| Volatility 1Y | 25.42% | 11.47% |
| Max drawdown | -24.02% | -24.39% |
Similar to SPAM and ACVF
Explore further