Screener
SPAM vs CGGO
Themes Cybersecurity ETF vs Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF
Key differences
- SPAM costs 0.12% less per year.
- CGGO is significantly larger than SPAM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SPAM covers north america markets; CGGO covers global.
- SPAM follows a index tracking strategy; CGGO uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| SPAM | CGGO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.47% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2M | $10.1B |
| Since | 2023 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.48% | 1.88% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.2% | +38.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +21.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.04 |
| Volatility 1Y | 25.42% | 16.82% |
| Max drawdown | -24.02% | -24.90% |
Similar to SPAM and CGGO
Explore further