Screener
SPAM vs CIBR
Themes Cybersecurity ETF vs First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF
Key differences
- SPAM costs 0.23% less per year.
- CIBR is significantly larger than SPAM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CIBR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SPAM | CIBR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.58% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2M | $10.2B |
| Since | 2023 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 0.48% | 0.61% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.2% | +16.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +25.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +14.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.99 |
| Volatility 1Y | 25.42% | 22.89% |
| Max drawdown | -24.02% | -33.89% |
Similar to SPAM and CIBR
Explore further