Screener
SPAM vs DEMZ
Themes Cybersecurity ETF vs Democratic Large Cap Core ETF
Key differences
- SPAM costs 0.10% less per year.
- DEMZ is significantly larger than SPAM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SPAM follows a index tracking strategy; DEMZ uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| SPAM | DEMZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.45% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2M | $59M |
| Since | 2023 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 0.48% | 0.46% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.2% | +26.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +22.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +13.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.16 |
| Volatility 1Y | 25.42% | 14.22% |
| Max drawdown | -24.02% | -27.17% |
Similar to SPAM and DEMZ
Explore further