Screener
SPAM vs DFLV
Themes Cybersecurity ETF vs Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF
Key differences
- DFLV costs 0.14% less per year.
- DFLV is significantly larger than SPAM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SPAM follows a index tracking strategy; DFLV uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| SPAM | DFLV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.21% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2M | $5.9B |
| Since | 2023 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.48% | 1.46% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.2% | +34.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +19.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.08 |
| Volatility 1Y | 25.42% | 11.35% |
| Max drawdown | -24.02% | -16.80% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SPAM and DFLV
Explore further