Screener
SPAM vs FDG
Themes Cybersecurity ETF vs American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF
Key differences
- SPAM costs 0.10% less per year.
- FDG is significantly larger than SPAM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SPAM follows a index tracking strategy; FDG uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| SPAM | FDG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.45% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2M | $387M |
| Since | 2023 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 0.48% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.2% | +37.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +32.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +13.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.23 |
| Volatility 1Y | 25.42% | 17.85% |
| Max drawdown | -24.02% | -43.69% |
Similar to SPAM and FDG
Explore further