Screener
SPAM vs FENI
Themes Cybersecurity ETF vs Fidelity Enhanced International ETF
Key differences
- FENI costs 0.07% less per year.
- FENI is significantly larger than SPAM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SPAM covers north america markets; FENI covers europe.
- SPAM follows a index tracking strategy; FENI uses active selection.
- FENI has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SPAM | FENI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.28% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2M | $9.1B |
| Since | 2023 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 0.48% | 2.93% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | europe |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.2% | +29.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 25.42% | 15.63% |
| Max drawdown | -24.02% | -14.20% |
Similar to SPAM and FENI
Explore further