Screener
SPAM vs FIVA
Themes Cybersecurity ETF vs Fidelity International Value Factor ETF
Key differences
- FIVA costs 0.17% less per year.
- FIVA is significantly larger than SPAM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SPAM covers north america markets; FIVA covers global.
- FIVA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SPAM | FIVA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.18% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2M | $533M |
| Since | 2023 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 0.48% | 2.63% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.2% | +36.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +22.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +12.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.17 |
| Volatility 1Y | 25.42% | 15.28% |
| Max drawdown | -24.02% | -39.60% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SPAM and FIVA
Explore further